Event/Cases no. 3
➳༻❀✿❀༺➳
ᴍᴀʀʀɪᴀɢᴇ ᴇqᴜᴀʟɪᴛʏ:
- Tested the full faith and credit clause to the test
- Baehr v. Lewin was a 1993 court case in which the Hawaii Supreme Court said the state's ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. This worried other states as they would be required to recognize those marriages
- In response to the panic, Congress passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which was signed by Clinton
- Declared that "no state/ other political subdivision within the United States need to recognize same-sex marriage concluded by another state"
- it also barred federal benefits for same sex-partners
- DOMA denoted a choice for the states which led many states to take up the policy issue of marriage equality
- U.S Supreme Court v. Windsor struck down the part of DOMA that upheld marriage equality in different states
- 2015, the Obergfell v. Hodges case had a sweeping effect when the Supreme Court clearly identified a constitutional right to marriage based on the 14th Amendment
ᴍᴄᴄᴜʟʟᴏᴄʜ ᴠ. ᴍᴀʀʏʟᴀɴᴅ:
- 1st challenge of the authority of U.S individual states
- Does Maryland have the right to tax paper currency needed by a branch of the U.S National Bank located in Maryland?
- Not mentioned in the Constitution, but the bank was created through the elastic clause
- Supreme Court rules:
- Establishes the doctrine of implied powers
- The U.S could coin and regulate money and under the necessary proper clause the U.S could establish a National Bank
- National Bank is supreme so Maryland can't tax a federal institution
ᴍᴀʀʙᴜʀʏ ᴠ. ᴍᴀᴅɪꜱᴏɴ:
- John Adams passed the Judiciary Act in spite of Thomas Jefferson who won the 1800 presidential election
- Adams added 16 judges and 42 justices before leaving office (approved by Senate - known as "midnight appointments")
- Marbury was denied his commission and takes the cause to a court
- Supreme Court Rules:
- Madison's actions are illegal, and it needs to be fixed
- The Judiciary Act passed in 1789 prevented the Supreme Court from fixing the issue
- The Judiciary Act is unconstitutional = Congress can't make changes to the Constitution through lawmaking alone because the Constitution is the Supreme Law
- Establishes Judicial Review = the power to declare a law unconstitutional
ɢɪʙʙᴏɴ ᴠ. ᴏɢᴅᴇɴ:
- The court must interpret the commerce clause of Article 1, Section 8
- New York gave Odgen rights to monopolize ferries under a specific route between NY and NJ
- Gibbons uses the same route under the license from the Federal government
- Supreme Court Rules:
- "Interstate Commerce" is defined broadly, thus Congress is allowed to regulate navigation between states
- Since the federal Licensing Act of 1793 is constitutional under the Commerce Clause, federal law trumps state law
ᴅʀᴇᴅ ꜱᴄᴏᴛᴛ ᴠ. ꜱᴀɴᴅꜰᴏʀᴅ:
- Dred Scott was a slave that spent 10 years living in free states (thanks to the Missouri Compromise)
- Scott sued Missouri for his freedom, claiming that he was a free man
- Supreme Court rules:
- They lacked jurisdiction to rules since African Americans aren't considered citizens
- Men of African Americans descent are considered property
- Deemed Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional, and that Congress could not free slaves in federal territories
ᴛʜᴇ ᴇᴠᴏʟᴜᴛɪᴏɴ ᴏꜰ ꜰᴇᴅᴇʀᴀʟɪꜱᴍ ᴛɪᴍᴇʟɪɴᴇ:
- Dual Federalism (the 1870s -1930s) - states and national government exercise exclusive authority through the powers given to them
- The 1930s - 1960s Cooperative Federalism - both governments coordinate their actions to solve national problems
- The 1970s-1980s: New Federalism - Based off of an idea that decentralization of policies enhances administrative efficiency, reduces overall public spending, and improves policy outcomes
- Competitive Federalism Today - Certain functions belong to the federal, state, and local government
ɪᴍᴍɪɢʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴ:
- States said they had the right to make immigration policy
- Staes had enacted a total of 39 laws related to immigration
- In 2014, States and Washington Dc, has passed 288 immigration-related laws
- 2010 Arizona passed Senate Bill 1070, which sought to make it difficult for illegal immigrants to live in the state => wanted them to return to their country
- Federal filed a suit to block the Arizona Law
ᴀʀɪᴢᴏɴᴀ ᴠ. ᴜɴɪᴛᴇᴅ ꜱᴛᴀᴛᴇꜱ:
- In 2012, Supreme Court struck down three of the four central provisions of the Arizona law:
- Allowing police officers to arrest an undocumented immigrant without a warrant
- Making it a crime to seek a job without proper immigration papers
- Making it a crime to be in Arizona without valid immigration paper
- The court upheld the “show me your papers” provision but warned them of racial profiling
✿❯────「✿」────❮✿
ʏᴏᴜ ᴀ ᴍᴇssᴀɢᴇ [📨]
Comments
Post a Comment